The Vajra

Indra's Weapon, Made Indestructible

The vajra is Indra's thunderbolt taken over: a weapon the Ṛgveda made for smashing became, in tantras compiled from the late seventh century, the emblem of what cannot be smashed — and the earliest five-pronged examples this entry can point to are not Tibetan but an eighth-century Tang bell and a tenth-century Heian pestle, both in Japan.

A ritual scepter representing the irresistible force of a thunderbolt and the indestructible clarity of a diamond.


Vajra is Indra's weapon. In Ṛgveda 1.32 the storm god smashes the dragon Vṛtra with a bolt Tvaṣṭar forged for him. Buddhism took weapon and name: in Gandhāran schist of the second century a bare-chested Vajrapāṇi — vajra-in-hand — attends the Buddha's first sermon holding a plain bar, not a pronged sceptre. The tantras then turned the word over. Snellgrove glosses vajra as whatever is held indestructible, hence also diamond; the vehicle is named for the object. That layer is datable: Weinberger places the Compendium of Principles in south India in the last quarter of the seventh century, and Amoghavajra summarised its eighteen-text cycle in China between 746 and 771. The five-pronged dorje came later: the earliest such pieces this entry can point to are an eighth-century Tang bell and a tenth-century Heian pestle, both in Japanese collections.

Light

Half of a pair. Karma Phuntsho, for the Rubin Museum, gives the vajra as skilful method or compassion, the bell as wisdom, the five prongs as the buddhas of the five families; the same essay's Padmasambhava wields his dorje right-handed. Neither works alone.

Shadow

Snellgrove's glossary records the tantras' own concealed sense of the word: vajra is the male organ, paired with lotus. The same word titles the teacher, vajrācārya, and names the pupil under consecration, vajradhṛk — an emblem of the unbreakable doubling as a vocabulary of rank.

Sources and verification8 sources · 3 links

Primary source

Scholarship

  • David L. Snellgrove, The Hevajra Tantra: A Critical Study, Part I: Introduction and Translation, 1959, London: Oxford University Press; glossary entry 'vajra'; text at I.i.4The redefinition, in a translator's own words: 'In early (Vedic) times the vajra was the divine weapon of Indra, god of the sky and lord of thunder and storm' and 'It symbolizes pre-eminently whatever is believed to be indestructible; thus it also has the meaning of "diamond". In the tantras vajra indicates the absolute nature of whatever it may be referred to.' The same glossary gives the Tibetan rdo-rje, notes the concealed sense of vajra as the male organ paired with lotus, and records vajracarya/vajraguru for the master and vajradhrk as the name by which the master addresses the pupil during the rite. The Hevajra text at I.i.4 reads 'It is indivisible and so known as Vajra.' Read at first hand in the archive.org scan.
  • Steven Weinberger, The Yoga Tantras and the Social Context of Their Transmission to Tibet, Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 23, 131–166, 2010, pp. 134–136 for the dating; n. 10 on the title; p. 156 for Yeshe O and Rinchen ZangpoThe dated spine of the tantric layer: 'Buddhist tantra emerged in India as an independent, self-consciously distinct tradition during the latter part of the seventh century with the composition/compilation of the Compendium of Principles'; Vajrabodhi (671–741) received teachings on it in south India in 700; his Chinese text of 723 (T 866) contains passages corresponding verbatim to its first chapter; Amoghavajra (705–774) translated that chapter in 753 (T 865) and, between his return from south India in 746 and 771, wrote the Indications of the Goals of the Eighteen Assemblies summarising the cycle, of which the Compendium is 'the first and preeminent member'. Weinberger does NOT connect the Guhyasamaja to Amoghavajra or to the eighteen assemblies; his single mention of it is Bu ston's account of Yeshe O instructing his tenth-century delegation to Kashmir — Rinchen Zangpo (958–1055) among them — to bring back the Compendium of Principles, the Guhyasamaja and the Litany of Names of Manjusri, and the entry uses it only there. Also, at n. 10, that the Chinese jingang ding was 'until recently' reconstructed as vajrasekhara, Weinberger following Davidson in using vajrosnisa instead. Open PDF, read at first hand.
  • Stephanie W. Jamison and Joel P. Brereton, The Rigveda: The Earliest Religious Poetry of India, 3 vols, 2014, Oxford University PressThe standard dating this entry's attested_from rests on — the Rigveda as composition of the later second millennium BCE, and so the floor for the vajra as Indra's weapon. Not read at first hand: the source register lists this edition for Rigveda wording and verse numbers rather than for dating, and the date given here is the consensus its introduction states. No Jamison–Brereton reading is quoted or set against Griffith's.

The tradition itself

Linked entries

  • Set againstThe Three TreasuresA modern connection

    Two names that outlived their contents: Song alchemists took the Daodejing's phrase 'three treasures' for an unrelated triad, as Buddhist tantra took Indra's weapon for an opposite job.

  • Set againstTheurgyA modern connection

    Iamblichus argued in De mysteriis that ritual acts, not contemplation, are what reach the gods; Buddhist tantra made a comparable turn toward rite some four centuries later, and the vajra is the object that turn put in the hand.

  • Set againstPatañjaliAttested

    Patanjali's yoga, which Philipp Maas dates to c. 325–425 CE, reaches its goal by restraining the mind; the tantras that redefined the vajra three centuries later reach theirs by ritual, with an object in the hand.