The Golem

Ancient Rite, Modern Legend

The Golem of Prague first reaches print in 1834, in a footnote to a German novel, 225 years after Judah Loew died, and the blood-libel plot everybody knows was written by Yudl Rosenberg in 1909 and sold as a rediscovered manuscript.

A man of clay brought alive by letters: mute, obedient, and dangerous the moment its maker forgets.


In the Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 65b, Rava creates a man and sends him to Rabbi Zeira, who speaks to him, gets no answer, and tells him to return to dust. The passage never uses the word golem, and the link to Sefer Yetzirah is Rashi's, not the text's. Eleazar of Worms, about 1200, supplies a procedure: virgin soil never dug, kneaded with living water, the alphabets of the 221 gates recited over each limb. By the mid-seventeenth century the maker was Elijah Ba'al Shem of Chelm, and Jacob Grimm's notice of 1808 has the story still Polish, emet on the forehead and the aleph rubbed out to leave met. Prague arrives late. Judah Loew is first named as maker in print in 1834, Leopold Weisel fixed the standard version in 1847, and the plot most readers know is Yudl Rosenberg's, 1909.

Light

Gershom Scholem read the medieval rite as proof of mastery, not a way to get a servant: what mattered was that Sefer Yetzirah's letters had been understood, and the undoing was in the recipe. Moshe Idel, against him, makes it operative magic, not inner experience.

Shadow

Rosenberg's protector appeared in 1909, ten years after the Polná ritual-murder charge in Bohemia; the blood-libel plot is generally read as his answer to it, a rescue written for people nobody rescued. Wegener's 1920 film made the ghetto a horror set, its creature everyone's monster.

Sources and verification11 sources · 3 links

Primary source

  • Talmud Bavli, Sanhedrin 65b (William Davidson digital edition, after Adin Steinsaltz), Sanhedrin 65bThat Rava created a man who would not answer Rabbi Zeira and was told to return to his dust; and that the Aramaic reads only bara gavra, with no word golem and no mention of Sefer Yetzirah, which is named in the adjoining line about Rav Hanina, Rav Oshaya and the calf. The English's "a golem, using forces of sanctity" is the edition's interpolation.
  • Hakham Tsevi Ashkenazi, She'elot u-Teshuvot Hakham Tsevi, no. 93 (Amsterdam), 1712, responsum 93That the golem was a live halakhic question in 1712 — whether one could be counted towards a minyan — more than a century before Prague acquired the legend, and that the case in view was the author's own ancestor Elijah Ba'al Shem of Chelm.
  • Jakob Grimm, "Entstehung der Verlagspoesie", Zeitung fur Einsiedler 1, 1808, p. 56The 1808 notice: Polish Jews, a clay figure called Golem that is brought to life when the Schemhamphoras is spoken over it and that cannot speak itself; Aemaeth written on its forehead as the life-token, the first letter rubbed out to leave Maeth, and the master crushed by the collapse. No Prague and no Maharal. Quoted in full in Dekel and Gurley's translation, p. 243.
  • Leopold Weisel, "Der Golem", in Wolf Pascheles, Gallerie der Sipurim (Prague), 1847, pp. 51-52The version that became standard for the rest of the century: Rabbi Loew under Rudolf II, the shem laid in the golem's mouth, the forgotten Sabbath, the rampage, and the remains in the attic of the Altneuschul. The title is given as on the 1847 title page and as Dekel and Gurley print it, "Gallerie der Sipurim [sic]"; library catalogues often normalise it to Sippurim. Later Sippurim printings are on archive.org; the 1847 first collection is not.
  • Yudl Rosenberg, Sefer Nifla'ot Maharal im ha-Golem (Piotrkow), 1909, title page and prefaceCited for what Rosenberg claimed in 1909 and never as evidence about the sixteenth century: a manuscript by the Maharal's son-in-law Isaac ben Shimshon Katz, and a golem made to defend the Jews of Prague against ritual-murder accusations.
  • Paul Wegener and Carl Boese (dirs), Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam, 1920, released 29 October 1920The film that carried the Prague golem to a mass audience, and its own animating device: a written word sealed in an amulet set into the creature's chest, neither the forehead token of the Polish tellings nor the mouth-slip of the Prague ones.

Scholarship

Further reading

  • Yudl Rosenberg, trans. and ed. Curt Leviant, The Golem and the Wondrous Deeds of the Maharal of Prague (Yale University Press), 2007, Leviant's introductionThe English text of Rosenberg's stories, with an introduction setting out the legend before and after 1909 — the route by which most English readers meet the Prague golem.

Linked entries

  • Derives fromSefer YetzirahAttested

    The rite is built from that book's letter-permutations — Eleazar of Worms, about 1200, has each limb formed while the alphabets of the 221 gates are recited over it — but the Talmud's own story of Rava names no book at all, and the connection to Sefer Yetzirah there is Rashi's.

  • Set againstStar of DavidAttested

    Two Prague emblems whose claims run ahead of their evidence at different scales: the hexagram is ascribed to King David and documented for the city's Jewish community only from Charles IV's grant of 1354, the golem to a rabbi who died in 1609 and documented only from 1834 — two millennia of gap in one case, two and a half centuries in the other.

  • Set againstHeinrich Cornelius AgrippaAttested

    Both turn on the power of Hebrew names, but Agrippa's Book II puts a five-letter name of Christ, YHShVH, in the scale of five: the ineffable name of God for the age of grace, where the age of the Law had the four-letter Tetragrammaton. That is a Christian Cabalist construction - the Tetragrammaton with a shin inserted - and not something Jewish sources supply.