The Shadow

Relative Evil, Absolute Evil

Aion (1951) gives the shadow seven paragraphs, and §19 splits it in two — the personal shadow can be seen through "with a little self-criticism", while the shadow met "as an archetype" raises "the same difficulties as with anima and animus" and, at the limit, "a rare and shattering experience" of absolute evil — the half rarely carried over into the popular shadow-work literature.

The hidden, rejected, or unacknowledged parts of our personality that we disown or project onto others.


Jung gave the shadow one chapter, seven paragraphs. Chapter II of Aion — Rascher, Zurich, 1951; Hull's English, 1959 — runs §13 to §19 across three pages, and a footnote records that it and the next chapter came from a 1948 Zurich lecture to the Swiss Society for Practical Psychology, printed that year in the Wiener Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde. §13 allows the rare case where the positive qualities are repressed. §19 then divides the thing in two: the personal shadow yields to "a little self-criticism", while the shadow appearing "as an archetype" meets "the same difficulties as with anima and animus", and to gaze into "the face of absolute evil" is "a rare and shattering experience". Integration is Jung's own word — at §42 the first stage of analysis — yet §16 grants assimilation only "to some extent".

Light

Recognising the shadow is, at §14, "the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge" — and Jung prices it: "no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort". §16 rates the recognition of a projection "a moral achievement beyond the ordinary".

Shadow

§16 says of a man's projection that "there is little hope that the subject will perceive this himself", which leaves the claim no negative case — the point where the charge of unfalsifiability attaches. In a 1946 BBC talk Jung applied the term outside the consulting room, to Germany and to nations.

Sources and verification5 sources · 9 links

Primary source

  • C. G. Jung, On the Psychology of the Unconscious (Collected Works 7), 1943, prefaces to the first (1917), second (1918), third (1926), fourth (1936) and fifth (1943) editions; §§27-29, §§41-42 and §103 n. 5; second-edition appendices, §438 and §§442-521The essay the Collected Works prints is the fifth edition, Über die Psychologie des Unbewussten (Rascher, Zurich, 1943), of a book first issued in 1917 as Die Psychologie der unbewussten Prozesse and retitled Das Unbewusste im normalen und kranken Seelenleben for the third edition of 1926; behind it stands the 1912 paper 'Neue Bahnen der Psychologie'. Jung's preface of April 1925 records 'fairly extensive alterations and improvements, particularly in the chapters on types and on the unconscious'; his 1943 preface records 'a thorough revision'. The printed text therefore cannot date Jung's shadow vocabulary to 1917: §41 has 'identification with the shadow' and §§27-29 'this shadow-side of the psyche', but only in the revised text, and the footnote in which Jung defines the shadow as "the 'negative' side of the personality" (§103 n. 5) cites Toni Wolff's 'Einführung in die Grundlagen der komplexen Psychologie' from the 1935 Festschrift, so that footnote cannot predate 1935. The second-edition appendices carry the unrevised early texts and can be dated: 'New Paths in Psychology' (1912), translated from the published German, has 'this shadow-side of the psyche' at §438; 'The Structure of the Unconscious' (§§442-521), translated from Jung's unpublished German manuscript of the 1916 Zurich lecture and first printed in French as 'La structure de l'inconscient', Archives de psychologie XVI (1916), 152-79, does not use the word shadow at all.
  • C. G. Jung, The Fight with the Shadow, 1946, Broadcast talk, BBC Third Programme, 3 November 1946; first published (in English) in The Listener (London), XXXVI (1946), no. 930, pp. 615-16; reprinted in Collected Works 10, Civilization in Transition, §§444-457Jung gave a talk broadcast by the BBC in 1946 which applied the shadow to Germany and to nations rather than to a patient. It was delivered and first printed in English, not translated from German.
  • C. G. Jung, Aion (Collected Works 9ii), 1951, §19, and the second footnote to §13§19, verbatim: 'With a little self-criticism one can see through the shadow - so far as its nature is personal. But when it appears as an archetype, one encounters the same difficulties as with anima and animus. In other words, it is quite within the bounds of possibility for a man to recognize the relative evil of his nature, but it is a rare and shattering experience for him to gaze into the face of absolute evil.' The same paragraph rules that the source of a projection 'is no longer the shadow - which is always of the same sex as the subject - but a contrasexual figure'. The footnote to §13 reads: 'The contents of this and the following chapter are taken from a lecture delivered to the Swiss Society for Practical Psychology, in Zurich, 1948. The material was first published in the Wiener Zeitschrift fur Nervenheilkunde und deren Grenzgebiete, I (1948): 4.' The German behind chapters II and III first appeared as "Schatten, Animus und Anima", Wiener Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde und deren Grenzgebiete, I:4 (June 1948), 295-307, from a lecture to the Schweizerische Gesellschaft für praktische Psychologie, Zurich, 1948.
  • C. G. Jung, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self (Collected Works 9ii), 1951, Part I, ch. II 'The Shadow', §§13-19 (pp. 8-10). German: Aion: Untersuchungen zur Symbolgeschichte (Psychologische Abhandlungen VIII), Rascher Verlag, Zurich, 1951 — Jung's part 'Beiträge zur Symbolik des Selbst', ch. II 'Der Schatten', pp. 22-26; trans. R. F. C. Hull, Bollingen Series XX, Pantheon Books, New York, 1959; 2nd edn, Princeton University Press, 1968Jung's connected treatment of the shadow runs from §13 to §19 over three pages. §13 names the shadow, the anima and the animus as the archetypes 'most clearly characterized from the empirical point of view', calls the shadow 'the most accessible of these, and the easiest to experience', and allows as exceptions 'those rather rare cases where the positive qualities of the personality are repressed, and the ego in consequence plays an essentially negative or unfavourable role'. §14: 'no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort' and 'This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.' §16: 'Although, with insight and good will, the shadow can to some extent be assimilated into the conscious personality, experience shows that there are certain features which offer the most obstinate resistance to moral control' - these being bound up with projections, whose recognition is 'a moral achievement beyond the ordinary', and of which 'there is little hope that the subject will perceive this himself'. §42 makes 'the integration of the shadow, or the realization of the personal unconscious' the first stage in the analytic process.

The tradition itself

  • Jung, Aion, 1951The esoteric reading given on this entry — CW 9ii, on the personal and archetypal shadow

Linked entries

  • Part ofThe Archetype and the Archetypal ImageAttested

    Aion §13 names the shadow, the anima and the animus as the three archetypes most clearly characterised from the empirical point of view, and calls the shadow the most accessible of them.

  • Part ofIndividuationAttested

    Aion §14 makes consciousness of the shadow 'the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge' - §14's word is self-knowledge, not individuation, so the tie to the larger process is drawn here and not in the paragraph.

  • CorrectsShadow WorkAttested

    Integration is Jung's own word - Aion §42 makes 'the integration of the shadow' the first stage of the analytic process - so the correction is not to the word but to the promise: §16 grants assimilation only 'to some extent', and §19, turning to the archetypal shadow, offers recognition and shock instead.

  • Set againstThe AnimaAttested

    Aion §19 rules that the shadow is always of the subject's own sex, so the moment a stubborn projection turns contrasexual its source is the anima and not the shadow at all.

  • Set againstThe AnimusAttested

    The same §19 rule from the woman's side; and at §35 Jung adds that 'it is easier to gain insight into the shadow than into the anima or animus', because education has already prepared everyone to hear that they are not pure gold.

  • Gave rise toShadow WorkAttested

    The genre takes its name and its authority from Jung's shadow, and specifically from the Aion chapter whose §19 calls facing absolute evil rare and shattering — a difficulty the genre does not mention.

  • Set againstThe Gendering of Anima and AnimusAttested

    Aion treats shadow, anima and animus in sequence, but only the contrasexual pair carries a fixed gender assignment — which is why only it drew this fifty-year objection.

  • Set againstThe PersonaAttested

    Two products of one act of selection: CW 7 §247 says "the purely personal attitude of the conscious mind evokes reactions on the part of the unconscious", which is the ground the shadow is formed on.

  • Set againstThe SelfAttested

    Aion (1951, §76) puts the shadow inside the self rather than against it — 'In the empirical self, light and shadow form a paradoxical unity. In the Christian concept, on the other hand, the archetype is hopelessly split into two irreconcilable halves' — and it is on that ground that Jung calls the Christ image perfect but not complete (§§74, 123).