The Persona
Worn, Not Owned
- Earliest record
- 1916Jung's 1916 lecture to the Zurich School for Analytical Psychology, published that year in French as "La Structure de l'inconscient", Archives de Psychologie XVI, pp. 152-79, and in English in 1917 as "The Conception of the Unconscious"
The persona as a segment of the collective psyche is 1916, not 1928. The 1917 English already says analysis shows 'what appeared to be individual is at bottom collective'.
C. G. Jung, 'The Conception of the Unconscious', in Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology, ed. Constance E. Long, 2nd edn (London, 1917), ch. XV; Jung, The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious (1928), CW 7 §§245-247.
Jung's term, from the Latin for an actor's mask, for the face a person shows to society.
More context
Persona is the Latin word for an actor's mask, and Jung chose it for that reason. His 1916 Zurich lecture, in English by 1917, already makes the claim. The persona is "a more or less accidental or arbitrary excerpt of the collective psyche", and analysed, "what appeared to be individual is at bottom collective". Psychological Types (1921) calls it a functional complex that forms for adaptation. He grants that the cut of the mask is one's own. But there is no way back through it: restoring the old state is an evasion, identifying with the collective psyche an inflation, and individuation lies beyond both.
Light
In revision Jung made the persona 'a function for adapting the individual to the real world', midway between world and individuality.
Shadow
Identify with the persona, Jung added later, and 'the subject's centre of gravity lies in the unconscious': 'the whole personality is collective'.