Moses and the Shepherd

I Want Burning

A revelation came to Moses from God—“Thou hast parted My servant from Me.Didst thou come (as a prophet) to unite, or didst thou come to sever?So far as thou canst, do not set foot in separation: of (all) things the most hateful to Me is divorce.I have bestowed on every one a (special) way of acting: I have given to every one a (peculiar) form of expression.In regard to him it is (worthy of) praise, and in regard to thee it is (worthy of) blame: in regard to him honey, and in regard to thee poison.I am independent of all purity and impurity, of all slothfulness and alacrity (in worshipping Me).I did not ordain (Divine worship) that I might make any profit; nay, but that I might do a kindness to (My) servants.In the Hindoos the idiom of Hind (India) is praiseworthy; in the Sindians the idiom of Sind is praiseworthy.I am not sanctified by their glorification (of Me); ’tis they that become sanctified and pearl-scattering (pure and radiant).I look not at the tongue and the speech; I look at the inward (spirit) and the state (of feeling).I gaze into the heart (to see) whether it be lowly, though the words uttered be not lowly,Because the heart is the substance, speech (only) the accident; so the accident is subservient, the substance is the (real) object.How much (more) of these phrases and conceptions and metaphors? I want burning, burning: become friendly with that burning!Light up a fire of love in thy soul, burn thought and expression entirely (away)!O Moses, they that know the conventions are of one sort, they whose souls and spirits burn are of another sort.”

Masnavi II.1750–1764 · tr. R. A. Nicholson, 1926

The shepherd does not go back to his old prayer. When Moses overtakes him with God's permission, he answers “I have passed beyond that”: “Thou didst ply the lash, and my horse shied, made a bound, and passed beyond the sky” (II.1787–1789). The rebuke God condemned is what carried him beyond it.

Nicholson, The Mathnawí of Jalálu'ddín Rúmí, vol. II (1926), Book II, vv. 1777–1794.


A shepherd prays to God as to a man; Moses rebukes him, and God rebukes Moses: “I want burning, burning.”

Mathnawī II.1720–1791, with Rūmī's application after it; the lines here are God's rebuke, II.1750–1764. Moses hears a shepherd offering to sew God's shoes, comb His head, kill His lice and bring Him milk, and rebukes him for blasphemy: God has no body and no needs. The shepherd says Moses has “burned my soul with repentance”, rends his garment and goes into the desert. A revelation then rebukes Moses for parting God's servant from Him — divorce, in a saying Whinfield marks as “A tradition”, is most hateful to God, who gave each people its own idiom and looks at the heart, not the words. Moses runs after the shepherd with permission to pray as he likes, but the shepherd says he has passed beyond that: Moses' lash made his horse leap beyond the sky. Rūmī ends by telling the reader that any praise of God, however better by comparison, is “even as the unseemly (words) of that shepherd”. Whinfield's 1887 abridgement gives it as Book II, Story VII.

Light

It defends the clumsy prayer against the correct one: God, not the shepherd, objects to Moses, and the test of worship becomes whether the heart is lowly and burning rather than whether the words are right.

Shadow

The prophet who spoke orthodox truth — that God has no body — is the one rebuked, and a reader can take that as leave to despise correct doctrine, rather than as Rūmī ends it: every praise, however better than the shepherd's, is “maimed” in relation to God.

Sources and verification3 sources · 5 links

Primary source

Linked entries

  • Attributed toRūmīAttested

    Told in Rūmī's Masnavi, where the narrator steps out at II.1775–1776 to say that to unfold Moses' inward state further would “root up (men's) minds”.

  • Part ofThe MasnaviAttested

    Book II of the Masnavi, vv. 1720–1791, begun after the date Rūmī gives at II.7, A.H. 662.

  • Set againstThe Song of the ReedAttested

    The reed complains of being severed from its bed; here God rebukes his own prophet for severing — “Didst thou come (as a prophet) to unite, or didst thou come to sever?”

  • Derives fromReynold A. NicholsonAttested

    The English and the note on each people's “idiom” are Nicholson's 1926 translation; his 1930 Appendix gives the Konya manuscript's different reading at v. 1759.

  • Set againstThe Bear and the FoolAttested

    The same maxim is used twice in Book II: Moses tells the shepherd “the friendship of a witless man is enmity” (II.1734) and God overrules him; here “the friendship of a fool is worse than (his) enmity” (II.2015), and the bear proves it true.