Hélène Smith and the Martian Language

French in Martian Dress

The best-documented mediumistic language of its age was refuted inside its own source: Flournoy's 1900 book prints Hélène Smith's Martian glossary beside his demonstration that its word order is French and one Martian word answers each French one.

A famous 1890s spiritualist case where linguists proved a medium's channeled 'Martian' language was cryptomnesia of French.


Catherine-Élise Müller (1861–1929) held a responsible post in a Geneva commercial house and gave séances for nothing; Théodore Flournoy, admitted to her circle in December 1894, called her Hélène Smith in print. His Des Indes à la planète Mars — Eggimann in Geneva, Alcan in Paris, 1900 — reproduces her Martian texts, alphabet and glossary, then takes them apart. Martian, born at a séance of 2 February 1896, uses no sound absent from French and lacks five of its letters; its word order is identical; one Martian word answers each French word, across a dozen texts and 160 distinct words. It is only disguised French, Flournoy wrote. Ferdinand de Saussure, whom he consulted, worked mainly on her Hindu cycle's pseudo-Sanskrit. In further texts of 1899–1900, printed in the 1901 sequel, Martian nouns still carried their French gender.

Light

A department manager in a Geneva commercial house, who had entered it at fifteen, built an alphabet, a lexicon and an inhabited planet out of her own French; Flournoy met five years of it with analysis rather than accusation, and psychology gained a case.

Shadow

Müller consented to the séances, not to the book. Sightseers came to her office to stare; she wrote that the science she served had shown her its ingratitude, and kept her last visions from him. A study can honour its subject and still consume her.

Sources and verification11 sources · 1 link

Primary source

Scholarship

The tradition itself

Further reading

Linked entries

  • Set againstJohn DeeA modern connection

    Dee received the Angelical tongue from 1583 through his scryer Edward Kelley, recorded it at length and never submitted it to analysis; Müller's Martian arrived the same way three centuries later and was taken apart by a professor of psychology in the very book that published it.